3 Comentarios

1. 
   captainfantastic · 2019-05-10 20:34

   @heliosstardeath the mystery is ... there was no low light. I overexposed it and overdeveloped... but this double x still looks underexposed!

2. 
   charliedontsurf · 2019-05-11 06:33

   I used the camera a few days ago and I noticed that the meter was set to 32iso or thereabouts, could this solve the mystery? Massive overexposure destroys the shadows but remnants of highlights somehow saved in development? @heliosstardeath

3. 
   captainfantastic · 2019-05-11 07:07

   @charliedontsurf the iso setting was from the velvia - but i think you´re right, the overexposure with the push of the stand development was too much for the double-x. @heliosstardeath